Electron density in the quiet solar coronal transition region from SoHO/SUMER measurements of S VI line radiance and opacity

TitleElectron density in the quiet solar coronal transition region from SoHO/SUMER measurements of S VI line radiance and opacity
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2009
AuthorsBuchlin, E., and Vial J.-C.
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume503
Pagination559-568
Abstract

Context: The steep temperature and density gradients that are measured in the coronal transition region challenge the model interpretation of observations. Aims: We derive the average electron density <ne> in the region emitting the S vi lines. We use two different techniques, which allow us to derive linearly-weighted (opacity method) and quadratically-weighted (emission measure method) electron density along the line-of-sight, to estimate a filling factor or derive the layer thickness at the formation temperature of the lines. Methods: We analyze SoHO/SUMER spectroscopic observations of the S vi lines, using the center-to-limb variations in radiance, the center-to-limb ratios of radiance and line width, and the radiance ratio of the 93.3-94.4 nm doublet to derive the opacity. We also use the emission measure derived from radiance at disk center. Results: We derive an opacity τ₀ at S vi 93.3 nm line center of the order of 0.05. The resulting average electron density <ne> , under simple assumptions concerning the emitting layer, is 2.4 x 10$^{16}$ m$^{-3}$ at T = 2 x 10⁵ K. This value is higher than (and inconsistent with) the values obtained from radiance measurements (2 x 10$^{15}$ m$^{-3}$). The last value corresponds to an electron pressure of 10$^{-2}$ Pa. Conversely, taking a classical value for the density leads to a too high value of the thickness of the emitting layer. Conclusions: The pressure derived from the emission measure method compares well with previous determinations. It implies a low opacity of between 5 x 10$^{-3}$ and 10$^{-2}$. It remains unexplained why a direct derivation leads to a much higher opacity, despite tentative modeling of observational biases. Further measurements in S vi and other lines emitted at a similar temperature should be completed, and more realistic models of the transition region need to be used.

DOI10.1051/0004-6361/200811588